Effect of sulfonylureas vs. DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in T2D :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Cardiovascular event risk in type 2 diabetes: Sulfonylureas vs. DPP-4 inhibitors

Type 2 diabetes, Cardiovascular Type 2 diabetes, Cardiovascular
Type 2 diabetes, Cardiovascular Type 2 diabetes, Cardiovascular

Sulfonylureas are widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardiovascular safety remains uncertain due to conflicting evidence.

See All

Key take away

Compared to DPP-4 inhibitors, glipizide is linked with a higher 5-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin.

Background

Sulfonylureas are widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardiovascular safety remains uncertain due to conflicting evidence. Hence, a comparative trial was performed to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events between individuals on treatment with sulfonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, aiming to guide safer treatment choices.

Method

Volunteers with T2D and moderate cardiovascular risk who were on metformin monotherapy were evaluated after initiating second-line therapy with either a sulfonylurea (glyburide, glipizide, or glimepiride) or a DPP-4 inhibitor (reference group). Data were analyzed from 10 U.S. health systems and 2 large insurance databases. The key outcome was a 4-point composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4), including ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death. Five-year event risks were calculated and analyzed.

Result

A total of 48,165 adults with T2D (median age 61 years; 47.1% female) who commenced second-line therapy after metformin were analyzed. Among them, 18,147 received glipizide, 14,282 glimepiride, 1,887 glyburide, and 13,849 a DPP4 inhibitor. Over a median follow-up of about 37 months, 3,158 participants (6.6%) experienced MACE-4. The estimated five-year MACE-4 risks were 8.1% for DPP4 inhibitors, 8.4% for glyburide, 8.6% for glimepiride, and 9.1% for glipizide. Relative to DPP-4 inhibitors, the 5-year risk ratio for MACE-4 was 1.13 with glipizide, 1.07 with glimepiride, and 1.04 with glyburide.

Conclusion

Glipizide showed the highest MACE-4 risk among sulfonylureas, implying it as a less suitable option for T2D patients with moderate cardiovascular risk.

Source:

JAMA Network Open

Article:

Cardiovascular Events in Individuals Treated With Sulfonylureas or Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

Authors:

Alexander Turchin et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: