Oral melatonin vs. nitrous oxide for pediatric dental sedation: Which works better? :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Pediatric dental anxiety: Melatonin shows comparable sedation to nitrous oxide

Pediatric dental sedation Pediatric dental sedation
Pediatric dental sedation Pediatric dental sedation

What's new?

In children, oral melatonin reduces dental anxiety and pain as effectively as nitrous oxide inhalation sedation, with comparable safety and recovery outcomes.

A new randomized clinical trial highlights oral melatonin as an effective and safe alternative to nitrous oxide (N2O) inhalation sedation for easing dental anxiety in children aged 5 to 8 years, offering promising implications for paediatric dentistry and behaviour management.

S. Sinha et al. conducted this randomized trial to assess the anxiolytic and sedative effects of oral melatonin against N2O in children, offering new insights into pediatric dental care. The study involved 78 cooperative children, who were randomly assigned to three groups:

  • Tell-Show-Do (control)
  • N2O inhalation sedation
  • Oral melatonin sedation

Anxiety was evaluated using the Venham Anxiety Scale, alongside physiological measures including pulse rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and salivary cortisol levels determined through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sedation depth was assessed with the Houpt Sedation Rating Scale, while post-operative recovery and parental satisfaction were recorded 24 hours following treatment. Statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA and paired t-tests, with effect sizes reported as Cohen’s d alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI) to quantify the magnitude and precision of observed effects.

Pediatric patients treated with N2O or oral melatonin showed marked improvements in anxiety and pain scores over the control group.

  • Both sedation methods led to significant reductions in Venham's Anxiety Scores (N2O: p < 0.001, d = 0.82; melatonin: p = 0.002, d = 0.68).
  • Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scores dropped substantially in both groups (N2O: d = 1.57; melatonin: d = 3.68), portraying strong analgesic and behavioral control.
  • Salivary cortisol levels also declined significantly in the N2O (p < 0.001, d = 0.91) and melatonin groups (p < 0.001, d = 0.74), while changes in the control group were not significant (p = 0.48).
  • Pulse rates dropped notably in both sedation groups (p < 0.001), whereas SpO2 remained stable across all participants.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed between N2O and melatonin regarding sedation effectiveness (p = 0.28) or post-operative recovery (p = 0.31), reinforcing oral melatonin as a safe, practical alternative for pediatric dental sedation.

Results confirmed that oral melatonin offered effective sedation and anxiety relief comparable to N2O, maintaining stable vitals and enhancing comfort, thus presenting a viable alternative for pediatric dental practice.

Source:

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Article:

Oral melatonin vs nitrous oxide inhalation for paediatric dental sedation: a randomised controlled ELISA-based study

Authors:

S. Sinha et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: