Intravenous iron and risk of infection in patients with heart failure :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Effect of intravenous iron on infection-linked hospitalization and mortality in heart failure

Heart failure Heart failure
Heart failure Heart failure

There are ongoing concerns that administering intravenous (IV) iron could magnify the risk of infections.

See All

Key take away

In patients with heart failure and diminished LVEF, iron repletion is not linked to an increased incidence of infection-related hospitalizations or deaths and may confer a protective effect, especially in those with TSAT under 20%.

Background

There are ongoing concerns that administering intravenous (IV) iron could magnify the risk of infections. Hence, the IRONMAN trial sought to explore whether treatment with IV ferric derisomaltose in individuals with heart failure and iron deficiency influenced the incidence of infection-related hospitalizations or deaths.

Method

In this randomized controlled trial, patients with symptomatic heart failure, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 45% or below, and either transferrin saturation (TSAT) under 20% or ferritin below 100 μg/L were enrolled. Volunteers were divided to get IV ferric derisomaltose or standard care. Blinded adjudication was used to assess infection, a pre-specified safety endpoint. The main focus was to investigate infections as the primary cause of hospitalization or death, considering both initial and repeated occurrences.

Result

Those receiving ferric derisomaltose exhibited a trend towards fewer infection-related events—both first-time (HR 0.79) and recurrent (rate ratio 0.85). Notably, hospitalizations due to infection were markedly reduced in the ferric derisomaltose group (HR 0.76), with 5% fewer individuals affected. This protective signal was especially evident in those with TSAT below 20%, suggesting that those with more pronounced iron deficiency benefited the most.

Conclusion

For those with heart failure and impaired heart function, addressing iron deficiency doesn’t increase the risk of serious infections—and may actually lower the chance of infection-related hospital stays or deaths, particularly when TSAT falls below 20%. These findings challenge previous concerns and support ferric derisomaltose as a potentially safer strategy in this population.

Source:

European Journal of Heart Failure

Article:

Effect of correcting iron deficiency on the risk of serious infection in heart failure: Insights from the IRONMAN trial

Authors:

Paul W Foley et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: