Effectiveness and safety comparison of dual-action intranasal sprays for AR :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Mometasone–azelastine vs. fluticasone–azelastine nasal sprays for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis Allergic rhinitis
Allergic rhinitis Allergic rhinitis

This study compared the therapeutic potential of mometasone furoate–azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray versus fluticasone furoate–azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray in allergic rhinitis (AR).

See All

Key take away

Both mometasone-azelastine and fluticasone-azelastine nasal sprays show comparable effectiveness in reducing allergic rhinitis symptoms. However, fluticasone-azelastine causes more bitterness and nasal irritation.

Background

This study compared the therapeutic potential of mometasone furoate–azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray versus fluticasone furoate–azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray in allergic rhinitis (AR).

Method

This multicenter, retrospective, comparative study was conducted across 30 ENT clinics. Patient medical records were assessed for demographics, clinical symptoms, treatment regimen, outcomes, and adverse events. Treatment efficiency was measured via the mean reduction in total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and non-nasal symptom scores from baseline to the end of intervention.

Result

Overall, 235 patients received mometasone-azelastine and 221 received fluticasone furoate-azelastine intranasal spray. At day 14, no statistically significant difference was noted between the groups for mean reduction in TNSS, as depicted in Table 1:

However, those treated with fluticasone-azelastine reported a significantly higher incidence of bitter taste and nasal discomfort. No treatment discontinuation, serious adverse events, or hospitalizations occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Both mometasone-azelastine and fluticasone-azelastine combination nasal sprays illustrated similar effectiveness in alleviating nasal and non-nasal AR symptoms by day 7 and day 14. However, the mometasone-based formulation exhibited better tolerability, with fewer reports of adverse taste and nasal irritation, making it a potentially preferable option for long-term management of AR.

Source:

International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Article:

Comparative clinical assessment of mometasone furoate-azelastine hydrochloride intranasal spray (Ryaltris AZ®) with fluticasone furoate-azelastine hydrochloride intranasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis in India

Authors:

Kabikant Samantaray et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: