ENT procedural competency: Expert consensus develops self-assessment checklists :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Validated self-assessment checklists for core ENT clinical procedures

ENT procedures ENT procedures
ENT procedures ENT procedures

Reliable assessment of instrumental examination skills is fundamental for ensuring competency in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery (OHNS).

See All

Key take away

Consensus-based self-assessment checklists standardize competency evaluation for five core ENT instrumental procedures and support objective learning curve assessment.

Background

Reliable assessment of instrumental examination skills is fundamental for ensuring competency in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery (OHNS). However, standardized methods for exploring ear, nose, and throat (ENT) examination techniques remain limited. This study sought to develop and validate expert consensus-based self-assessment checklists with clearly defined success and failure criteria to support competency assessment and evaluation of procedural learning curves.

Method

Researchers executed a two-round modified Delphi consensus study involving OHNS experts and experienced residents. The panel developed self-assessment checklists for five commonly performed instrumental ENT procedures:

  • Flexible pharyngolaryngoscopy (Adults)
  • Flexible pharyngolaryngoscopy (Pediatrics)
  • Rigid nasal endoscopy
  • Otomicroscopy
  • Otoendoscopy

Volunteers rated checklist items for clinical utility using a nine-point Likert scale. The panel also checked the minimum number of supervised procedures and acceptable failure rates required before trainees could transition from supervised to independent practice.

Result

The Delphi process achieved consensus on 54 checklist items across the five procedures. The final validated checklists comprised the following components:

  • Adult flexible pharyngolaryngoscopy: 8 anatomical landmarks and 3 technical assessment items.
  • Pediatric flexible pharyngolaryngoscopy: 5 anatomical landmarks and 5 technical assessment items.
  • Rigid nasal endoscopy: 6 anatomical landmarks and 3 technical assessment items.
  • Otoendoscopy: 6 anatomical landmarks and 5 technical assessment items.
  • Otomicroscopy: 5 anatomical landmarks and 8 technical assessment items.

A procedure was classified as unsuccessful if any required checklist item was not completed correctly. The expert panel estimated acceptable failure rates of 5%–10% for residents and approximately 2% for experienced clinicians performing these procedures.

Conclusion

Consensus-based procedural benchmarks were successfully defined for five essential ENT examinations, offering a practical framework for objective skills assessment and trainee development. The resulting methodology provided an important foundation for future validation studies exploring procedural learning curves and performance outcomes.

Source:

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Article:

Designing self-assessment tools for learning five instrumental clinical procedures in ENT: A modified Delphi consensus approach

Authors:

Maha Abbas et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: