Treatment strategies for patchy alopecia areata :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Intralesional corticosteroids vs. apremilast in patchy alopecia areata: A comparative study

Alopecia areata Alopecia areata
Alopecia areata Alopecia areata

Alopecia areata is a chronic, immune-driven ailment marked by nonscarring hair loss, often presenting a therapeutic challenge due to its unpredictable course and variable treatment outcomes.

See All

Key take away

Intralesional corticosteroids markedly reduce hair loss in patchy alopecia areata, while apremilast, alone or with corticosteroids, shows no clear benefit.

Background

Alopecia areata is a chronic, immune-driven ailment marked by nonscarring hair loss, often presenting a therapeutic challenge due to its unpredictable course and variable treatment outcomes. This study examined the safety and effectiveness of three approaches—oral apremilast, intralesional corticosteroids (ILC), and their combination—in addressing patchy alopecia areata.

Method

Overall, 60 individuals suffering from patchy alopecia areata were randomly allocated to one of three treatment arms: oral apremilast (Group A), ILC (Group B), or a combination of both (Group C). Hair loss severity was quantified via the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Safety and adverse events were closely monitored. Group comparisons were carried out using non-parametric statistical tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Result

ILC therapy resulted in a markedly greater reduction in median SALT scores—2.47 (1.76, 5.07) post-treatment, and 5.08 (3.80, 7.53) at 6 months—as opposed to the other groups. In contrast, neither apremilast alone nor its combination with ILC illustrated statistically significant improvements, though some individual responses were observed. Reported side effects were mild, with transient pain and burning at ILC injection sites, along with occasional cases of gastritis and relapse in the apremilast group.

Conclusion

ILC proved to be a front-runner for patchy alopecia areata management. Apremilast, whether as monotherapy or in combination, did not achieve statistical significance in this study, though its role in specific patient subsets warrants further exploration. Larger trials with extended follow-ups are essential to refine therapeutic strategies and optimize outcomes for such patients.

Source:

Archives of Dermatological Research

Article:

Comparing the efficacy of oral apremilast, intralesional corticosteroids, and their combination in patients with patchy alopecia areata: a randomized clinical controlled trial

Authors:

Sankalp Awasthi et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: