Assessing food-related fear in upper gastrointestinal disorders: Evidence for FFQ-9 :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Fear of food in functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis: Validation of FFQ-9

Functional dyspepsia, Gastroparesis Functional dyspepsia, Gastroparesis
Functional dyspepsia, Gastroparesis Functional dyspepsia, Gastroparesis

Fear of food is a common but underrecognized concern among patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis, conditions often characterized by nausea, early satiety, and postprandial discomfort.

See All

Key take away

The newly developed 9-item Fear of Food Questionnaire (FFQ-9) effectively measures food-related fear and correlates with symptom burden and quality of life in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis.

Background

Fear of food is a common but underrecognized concern among patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis, conditions often characterized by nausea, early satiety, and postprandial discomfort. The original Fear of Food Questionnaire (FFQ) was designed to assess food-related fear, but its psychometric properties had not been validated in functional dyspepsia/gastroparesis populations.

Additionally, the questionnaire’s length and five-factor structure may limit its practicality in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess the factor structure of the original FFQ, develop a shorter version, and assess its validity and clinical usefulness.

Method

Researchers conducted a psychometric validation study involving 276 consecutive adults undergoing evaluation for gastroparesis. The study population was predominantly female (66%), White (80%), with a mean age of 42.5 years. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to assess the suitability of the original five-factor structure, as well as alternative unidimensional and hierarchical models.

Unique variable analysis was used to identify redundant items and create a shortened questionnaire. Subsequently, exploratory graph analysis evaluated the structural fit of the abbreviated instrument. Convergent validity, divergent validity, and clinical utility were also examined.

Result

The original FFQ structure did not adequately capture food-related fear in patients with FD and gastroparesis. Neither the established five-factor model nor a simplified single-factor model demonstrated satisfactory performance in this population. Researchers identified multiple overlapping items and successfully reduced the questionnaire to a 9-item version, termed the FFQ-9. Key findings included:

  • The FFQ-9 demonstrated appropriate model fit on exploratory graph analysis.
  • The tool showed strong convergent validity, indicating it effectively measured the intended construct of food-related fear.
  • It also exhibited strong divergent validity, confirming that it remained distinct from unrelated psychological constructs.
  • Higher FFQ-9 scores were linked with:
    (a) Greater symptom severity on the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM)
    (b) Lower health-related quality of life on the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) instrument

These findings support the questionnaire's potential value as both a research and clinical assessment tool.

Conclusion

The FFQ-9 proved to be a practical and reliable tool for assessing food-related fear, with higher scores correlating with increased symptom severity and reduced quality of life. Future studies should evaluate the responsiveness of FFQ-9 scores to treatment-related changes and explore their applicability in other patient populations.

Source:

Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Article:

Validation of a Short-Form Fear of Food Questionnaire in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia and Gastroparesis

Authors:

Sophie R Abber et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: