Tegoprazan shows comparable healing and tolerability to PPIs in erosive esophagitis :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Study compares tegoprazan vs. PPIs for erosive esophagitis

Erosive esophagitis Erosive esophagitis
Erosive esophagitis Erosive esophagitis

What's new?

Tegoprazan is as effective and safe as PPIs for treating erosive esophagitis, with consistent efficacy regardless of CYP2C19 genotype.

A systematic review and meta-analysis has revealed that tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), is as effective and safe as traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in relieving erosive esophagitis (EE). The study analyzed data from 4 randomized controlled trials involving 963 patients with endoscopically confirmed EE, comparing tegoprazan directly with various PPIs.

Helai Hussaini and other researchers carried out a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, focusing on studies that investigated healing rates and safety outcomes. Meta-analysis showed no prominent difference in healing rates between tegoprazan and PPIs overall (risk ratio [RR]: 1.03). The results were consistent at both 4 weeks (RR: 1.05) and 8 weeks (RR: 1.01).

In terms of safety, tegoprazan illustrated a profile comparable to PPIs. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (RR: 0.93), drug-related adverse events (RR: 0.93), and serious adverse events (RR: 1.07) did not considerably differ between the groups. Symptom relief was also similar across all the included studies. Importantly, tegoprazan maintained consistent efficacy regardless of CYP2C19 genotype, a key metabolic pathway affecting the response to many PPIs. This may yield a therapeutic edge in populations with genetic variability in PPI metabolism.

However, the authors noted several limitations. Most patients enrolled had mild-to-moderate disease (Los Angeles classification grades A and B), leaving uncertainty about the drug’s usefulness in more severe cases. Additionally, the trials were largely conducted in Asian populations, and follow-up durations were relatively short. Despite these limitations, this analysis is the first to directly compare tegoprazan with PPIs in EE, and it supports tegoprazan as a viable alternative in clinical practice. The findings highlight the requisition for further trials evaluating long-term outcomes and broader population groups.

Source:

Cureus

Article:

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tegoprazan Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Erosive Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors:

Helai Hussaini et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: