Intranasal insulin fails to improve cognition in Alzheimer’s disease :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Can intranasal insulin boost brain function in Alzheimer’s disease?

Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease
Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease Mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease

What's new?

Intranasal insulin therapy does not deliver significant cognitive, functional, or biomarker benefits in mild cognitive impairment or mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease.

A growing body of research has linked central insulin resistance to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) development, giving rise to the concept of AD as a possible form of “type 3 diabetes.” Based on this hypothesis, intranasal insulin has been explored as a novel, non-invasive strategy to enhance brain insulin signaling while avoiding systemic metabolic side effects.

However, new evidence suggests that this approach may not deliver meaningful clinical benefits. Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to monitor the efficiency and safety of intranasal insulin in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild-to-moderate AD.

The analysis encompassed studies comparing intranasal insulin with placebo, with a focus on both cognitive and functional outcomes, as well as biomarker changes. The literature search covered Embase. PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) through April 2025. Outcomes were pooled via random-effects models, and study quality was assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Primary endpoints included:

  • Cognitive performance measured by the 13-item version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog13).
  • Global and functional measures such as Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS), Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), delayed recall, and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL).

Secondary endpoints included:

  • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers: Amyloid-β42 (Aβ42), phosphorylated tau (p-tau181), and total tau.
  • Safety outcomes, including therapy discontinuation and adverse events.

Overall, 5 RCTs involving 540 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Across pooled analyses, intranasal insulin did not demonstrate a statistically significant advantage over placebo for any major cognitive or functional outcome:

  • ADAS-Cog13: Mean difference −1.09.
  • ADCS-ADL: Mean difference 0.06.
  • No meaningful differences were observed for CDR-SB, DSRS, or delayed recall.

Similarly, intranasal insulin did not considerably alter CSF biomarkers, including Aβ42, total tau, or phosphorylated tau, suggesting no detectable impact on core AD pathology. From a safety perspective, intranasal insulin was generally well-tolerated, but some differences emerged:

  • Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the insulin group (risk ratio 1.57).
  • Cardiovascular events occurred less frequently with insulin compared with placebo (risk ratio 0.30).
  • Rates of treatment discontinuation and other adverse events were similar between groups.

This study challenges the growing interest in intranasal insulin as a treatment for AD, showing no meaningful improvement in cognition, daily functioning, or key biomarkers among patients with MCI or mild-to-moderate AD.

Source:

Revue Neurologique

Article:

Intranasal insulin for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors:

A M P Silva et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: