Alzheimer’s anti-amyloid therapy yields marginal benefit amid safety concerns :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Anti-amyloid Alzheimer’s therapy shows minimal cognitive gains and high risk of ARIA

Alzheimer disease Alzheimer disease
Alzheimer disease Alzheimer disease

What's new?

Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid produce minimal cognitive and functional improvements in Alzheimer’s dementia that do not reach clinical significance, while significantly increasing the risk of ARIA-related harms.

A meta-analysis evaluating the clinical impact of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease reveals only modest cognitive and functional improvements, accompanied by significant risks.

Mark H Ebell and other researchers systematically reviewed PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, 5 clinical trial registries, and reference lists to point out randomized controlled trials comparing anti-amyloid antibodies with placebo. Included studies utilized doses consistent with phase 3 trials or those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and reported at least 1 clinically meaningful benefit or harm. Data from at least 2 independent researchers were extracted for random-effects meta-analysis. The focus was on alteration in functional and cognitive scales and assessing whether these fulfilled the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

The analysis incorporated 19 publications encompassing 23,202 volunteers and examined 8 different anti-amyloid antibodies. Results revealed minor improvements over placebo in key measures:

  • Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog 11–14): Standardized mean difference (SMD) of –0.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.10 to –0.04)
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): Improvement of 0.32 points (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50)
  • Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes: Mean difference of –0.18 points (95% CI, –0.34 to –0.03)
  • Combined functional scores: SMD of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13)

Notably, none of these improvements—including those observed with lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab—reached the MCID threshold, suggesting limited clinical relevance. The study also highlighted critical safety concerns. Those treated with anti-amyloid antibodies faced markedly heightened risks of:

  • Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-edema: Relative risk (RR) = 10.29; number needed to harm (NNH) = 9
  • Symptomatic ARIA-edema: RR = 24.3; NNH = 86
  • ARIA-hemorrhage: RR = 1.74; NNH = 13

These findings indicate that while anti-amyloid therapies may offer slight cognitive and functional benefits, the improvements are minimal and overshadowed by clinically meaningful adverse effects. The authors conclude that current monoclonal antibody treatments for Alzheimer’s dementia offer limited clinical benefit and carry substantial risks, emphasizing the requisition for careful patient selection and ongoing evaluation of safety profiles.

Source:

Annals of Family Medicine

Article:

Clinically Important Benefits and Harms of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Amyloid for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors:

Mark H Ebell et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: