NSAID-induced ulcer prevention in high-risk patients :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers in high-risk patients: A comparative review

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced peptic ulcers and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding are important complications in patients requiring long-term NSAID therapy, particularly those with a previous history of peptic ulcers.

See All

Key take away

Proton pump inhibitor monotherapy remains a highly evidence-supported strategy for preventing NSAID-induced peptic ulcer recurrence and gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients.

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced peptic ulcers and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding are important complications in patients requiring long-term NSAID therapy, particularly those with a previous history of peptic ulcers. Several medications are used to minimize this risk, but the optimal strategy for NSAID ulcer prevention in high-risk patients remains uncertain. Hence, this study explored the efficacy and safety of various available preventive treatments.

Method

This systematic review and network meta-analysis included 22 randomized controlled trials involving 7,768 patients using NSAIDs who had a documented history of peptic ulcers. The analysis compared proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, prostaglandin analogs, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and gastric mucosal protective agents for the prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications.

The primary efficacy outcomes were peptic ulcer recurrence and ulcer-related bleeding. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events. Random-effects network models were used to assess relative and absolute risks, calculate numbers needed to treat (NNTs), and rank the preventive strategies.

Result

Numerous treatment strategies demonstrated substantial protection against NSAID-induced peptic ulcer recurrence compared with placebo. COX-2 inhibitor plus PPI, P-CABs, COX-2 inhibitor monotherapy, and PPI monotherapy were associated with marked reductions in ulcer recurrence, with NNTs of 5–6.

A similar pattern was noted for the prevention of GI bleeding, suggesting that acid suppression and COX-2-selective strategies may provide clinically meaningful protection in high-risk NSAID users. However, safety findings differed between treatments. Prostaglandin analogs increased adverse events and treatment discontinuations, indicating poorer tolerability when compared with several alternative preventive approaches.

Conclusion

For high-risk NSAID users with a history of peptic ulcers, PPI monotherapy remains a well-supported approach for preventing recurrent peptic ulcers and GI bleeding. COX-2 inhibitor + PPI therapy and P-CABs may offer additional protection in very high-risk patients, but their use must be balanced against safety, tolerability, and cost considerations.

Source:

Digestive and Liver Disease

Article:

Comparing the efficacy and safety of medications to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers in high-risk patients: A network meta-analysis

Authors:

Xu Huang et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: