Bariatric surgery vs. GLP-1 RAs for class II and III obesity :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Comparing long-term results of bariatric and GLP-1 treatments

Obesity, Bariatric surgery Obesity, Bariatric surgery
Obesity, Bariatric surgery Obesity, Bariatric surgery

Obesity remains a major chronic ailment with severe health and economic effects. 

See All

Key take away

In adults with class II and III obesity, metabolic bariatric surgery delivers nearly 3-fold greater weight loss at lower health care costs compared with GLP-1 RA therapy.

Background

Obesity remains a major chronic ailment with severe health and economic effects. Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most beneficial intervention for severe obesity, while glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have surfaced as a leading pharmacologic alternative. This study aimed to evaluate differences in weight-loss outcomes and ongoing healthcare costs between MBS and GLP-1 RA therapy among obesity patients.

Method

Researchers conducted a real-world cohort analysis using United States-based data from the Highmark Health insurance claims and Allegheny Health Network electronic medical records. Adults with class II or III obesity treated with either MBS (sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass) or GLP-1 RAs (dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, semaglutide, or tirzepatide) were included, provided they maintained enrollment for a minimum of six months before treatment and had at least 12 months of follow-up.

Propensity score weighting was applied to balance demographic factors, baseline costs, comorbidities, smoking status, and prior healthcare utilization. Outcomes were evaluated over a two-year period, comparing weight loss and monthly medical and pharmacy expenditures, with adjusted mean costs estimated using a linear mixed-effects model.

Result

The final analysis included 30,458 patients with severe obesity, with:

  • 14,101 undergoing MBS
  • 16,357 receiving GLP-1 RA therapy

After adjustment, baseline profiles between treatment groups remained comparable. Total healthcare spending over two years was higher in the GLP-1 RA group, primarily attributed to sustained pharmacy costs extending into the second year of treatment. Clinically, bariatric surgery resulted in markedly greater total weight reduction, delivering nearly three times the weight loss achieved with GLP-1 RA therapy (Table 1).

 

Conclusion

Metabolic bariatric surgery provided greater and more durable weight loss at a lower cumulative cost than GLP-1 RAs. These real-world findings challenge the traditional positioning of bariatric surgery as a last-resort treatment and highlight its potential role as a cost-effective, durable intervention for severe obesity.

Source:

JAMA Surgery

Article:

Obesity Treatment With Bariatric Surgery vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Authors:

Tyson S Barrett et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: