Efficacy of pelvic pain management programme for chronic pelvic pain :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

6-month clinical outcomes of pelvic pain management programme

Endometriosis Endometriosis
Endometriosis Endometriosis

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) markedly affects quality of life, particularly in women with endometriosis-associated pain.

See All

Key take away

A multidisciplinary pelvic pain management programme improves pain, physical function, and psychological outcomes in chronic pelvic pain, with sustained benefits regardless of endometriosis status.

Background

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) markedly affects quality of life, particularly in women with endometriosis-associated pain. Although pain management programmes are recommended for chronic pain, evidence supporting their potency in endometriosis-related CPP remains limited. This study determined the clinical potency of a multidisciplinary pelvic pain management programme (PPMP) and compares outcomes in females with and without endometriosis.

Method

This study was conducted using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing pain intensity, physical function, and psychological well-being. Assessments were performed at baseline (T1), post-treatment (T2), and 6-month follow-up (T3) in women enrolled in a specialized pelvic pain rehabilitation programme. Outcomes were compared based on endometriosis diagnosis.

Result

In this longitudinal cohort study, clinically meaningful improvements were observed across pain, physical function, and psychological health, with sustained benefits at 6 months. Notably, remarkable improvements were observed immediately post-intervention (T2) and were maintained or enhanced at follow-up (T3). No vital differences were found between women with vs. without endometriosis, indicating consistent programme effectiveness (Table 1).

Conclusion

The multidisciplinary PPMP delivered sustained, clinically meaningful improvements in CPP, physical functioning, and psychological wellbeing, regardless of endometriosis status. These findings highlight the role of central sensitization and psychosocial mechanisms in CPP and support wider access to structured PPMPs. Further multicentre and long-term studies are warranted to confirm durability of outcomes.

Source:

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology

Article:

Assessing the effectiveness of a pelvic pain management programme: does an endometriosis diagnosis influence outcome (a comparative analysis of outcomes in women with and without endometriosis)

Authors:

Selina Johnson et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en ru
Try: