New evidence supports NAT integration for safer blood transfusion screening :- Medznat
EN | RU
EN | RU

Help Support

By clicking the "Submit" button, you accept the terms of the User Agreement, including those related to the processing of your personal data. More about data processing in the Policy.
Back

Dual testing strategy enhances detection of HBV and HCV in blood donors

Blood transfusion screening Blood transfusion screening
Blood transfusion screening Blood transfusion screening

What's new?

Combining nucleic acid testing with serology enhances blood donor screening by detecting early and previously undetected viral infections more effectively.

Safe blood transfusion remains a major clinical priority, as no single test can eliminate infectious risk. Serological screening may fail to detect infections during early or asymptomatic stages, particularly for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). To address this limitation, researchers aimed to evaluate whether integrating nucleic acid amplification techniques/tests (NAT) with routine serology improves detection rates and enhances blood donor screening safety.

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using data from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A total of 29 studies were included. The analysis focused on identifying HBV, HCV, and HIV infections using combined NAT and serological testing. Pooled estimates were calculated to evaluate NAT-positive cases, particularly among seronegative donors, including those in the window period (WP) and with occult infections.

The diagnostic WP—a critical phase when infections may evade detection by standard serology—illustrated the highest burden for HBV, with 154 cases identified. Across the included studies:

  • 10 studies reported both occult HBV infections and WP cases
  • 13 studies identified donors during the occult HBV phase
  • 17 studies detected infections during the WP

Meta-analysis revealed a significant pooled frequency (p < 0.001) of NAT-positive results among donors who initially tested negative on serological screening for HBV, HCV, and HIV. When analyzed separately:

  • NAT detected substantially more HBV and HCV cases missed by serology (p < 0.001)
  • For HIV, the added detection by NAT over serology was not statistically significant (p = 0.085)

Additionally, pooled frequencies of NAT-positive results among serology-positive cases for HBV, HCV, and HIV were also significant (p < 0.001). Thus, NAT reduces the likelihood of transfusion-transmitted infections by identifying cases during early infection and occult phases—particularly for HBV. This dual-testing strategy strengthens blood safety protocols and enhances early detection, which is critical for preventing disease transmission.

Source:

Reviews in Medical Virology

Article:

Improved Safety of Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology Combined With Serological Tests for Screening Blood Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors:

Heloise Skiavine Madeira et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: